Nhl Governors Decide To Leave Game Alone
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-08-16 17:09:52
One good thing: they voted to change the schedule back to the pre-lockout version. Now all teams will compete each other next toughen. Thank you!However they should undergo removed the instigator rule ditched the shootout and taken another zebra off the ice. Too many officials on an ice sheet that's already crowded. (IMG:)
One good thing: they voted to change the schedule back to the pre-lockout version. Now all teams will play each other next season. Thank you!However they should have removed the instigator rule ditched the shootout and taken another zebra off the ice. Too many officials on an ice sheet that's already crowded. (IMG:)
One good thing: they voted to change the schedule back to the pre-lockout version. Now all teams will compete each other next season. Thank you!However they should have removed the instigator rule ditched the shootout and taken another zebra off the ice. Too many officials on an ice pelt that's already crowded. (IMG:)
One good thing: they voted to change the schedule back to the pre-lockout version. Now all teams ordain play each other next toughen. Thank you!However they should undergo removed the instigator command ditched the shootout and taken another zebra off the ice. Too many officials on an ice sheet that's already crowded. (IMG:)
One good thing: they voted to change the schedule back to the pre-lockout version. Now all teams will play each other next season. Thank you!However they should have removed the instigator rule ditched the shootout and taken another zebra off the ice. Too many officials on an ice pelt that's already crowded. (IMG:)
I actually desire the current schedule. I don't care to see the Ducks and Sharks each year. And the South East is a great Division. But you're singin my song on the rest of it brother!-HckyFght!"Proud Resident of Section 417!"
To what end? I agree with Brian Burke. Scoring isn't what sells it's scoring chances. There are plenty of scoring chances now that you can't hook and direct and water ski through the neutral govern. If goalies make saves then good for them. A save can be as exciting as a goal. Bigger nets might result in more goals or not. I think I saw Burke say something along the lines of "they undergo bigger goals in soccer and they score a lot alter?" Today's goalies are just better athletes. I'm all for keeping their equipment size within reasonable boundaries but there's just no need to alter the goals bigger. Four on four hockey is some of the dullest garbage to watch and I'd like to see them do away with it in overtime. I really don't desire it. get the game alone. I think it's in a good place right now. You don't undergo all the restraining you had prior to the lockout and you don't have the endless parade to the penalty box that you had the first year after the lockout--mainly because by calling it to the letter guys learned that they just can't play that way anymore so they don't. You don't see as much restraining you don't see those calls made and the prove is a bet that flows pretty quickly from end to end generates chances and generates a fair share of hard hitting thanks to guys not being restrained from getting a continue of go going. The game is fine. I'd be happy to get rid of the four on four in OT and get rid of the shootout but beyond that it's OK.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://boards.washingtoncaps.com/index.php?showtopic=61859
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
